Look guys and gals, I've been a dedicated Linux user for about 4 years now,
and all the while I've thought that ext2 was and is a filesystem. I was
just wondering if anyone could shed some light on why someone might offer
the fact that it is not. So, if not one person on this list has any idea
why this might be, then I'm assuming that there is not much truth to this
statement...case closed. Thanks anyway.
--Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of kf
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 6:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ext2...filesystem?
I've been using ext2 for keeping track of files and subdirectories etc.
for close to eight years and it sure seems like a file system.
Define "true filesystem".
kf
--
"If George W. Bush spoke his mind, he'd be speechless."
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Mark Basil wrote:
= Someone today told me that ext2 is not a true filesystem. Is this
correct?
= What are the diferences of ext2 and say...(I know, I know) FAT.
=
= Sincerely,
=
= Mark A Basil Jr.
= Alabanza Technical Support Team
= Alabanza Corporation
= ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`
=
=
=
=
= _______________________________________________
= Redhat-list mailing list
= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
=
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
