On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 05:48:33PM -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> >
> Except that DSL is never transformed to audo - it runs at a much higher
> frequency. That is why you can have voice and DSL on the same pair of
> wires, and use a splitter at each end. Besides, most of the telephone
> network is not audio any more. The only part that is audio in most
> areas is the connection from the exchange to your phone - for the rest
And this is precisely the only place DSL has any meaning: from modem
to Central Office, where it is decoded.
> I guess you can get away with calling it a DSL "modem", but I still
> think it is streching the term.
Maybe it depends on what the meaning of 'is' is ;)
--
Hal B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
