Something you have not mentioned yet...brand and type of hub, and types of
cards being used. Also, if the cards are 10/100, have they been
configured to not autodetect?
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Jack Bowling wrote:
> ** Reply to message from Vidiot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 24
> Nov 2000 03:56:57 -0600 (CST)
>
>
> > >Yes, Vidiot's theory makes sense. However, there is a slim
> > >possibility that some switches on the hub are set wrong? Perhaps
> > >the 'cascade' button or something similar to that effect is set
> > >wrong on the hub itself. Bear in mind, a crossover cable IIRC is
> > >necessary between two hubs, and the 'cascade' button has to be in
> > >a particular state for that sort of connection. I'm babbling,
> > >so I'll just say this:
> > >
> > >play around with the switches (if any present) on the hub. <g>
> > >L.G.
> >
> > That would only affect one of the three boxes, not all of them. The
> > original poster made it sound like he ran ping tests from all three boxes
> > and it didn't work. But, it is possible that he ran ping tests from only
> > one boxes to the others, in which the switch could indeed be set wrong.
>
> Sorry, I wasn't clear. I pinged from all 3 boxes with the same result.
> The salient fact is that it works with one hub perfectly and not TWO
> others (I just tried another brand of hub this morning) with the same
> settings. And none of the cables are attached to the uplink port of the
> hubs. Strange. Must be something internal to the hubs.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
