I think part of the problem is that you have the 40GB drive slaved to
the 3GB drive...

That 40GB drive is a much faster drive than is your 3GB drive...the
controller from the 3GB drive may very well be holding it back.

You might want to try making the 40GB drive the secondary master, and
see if that clears anything up for you.

On Tue, 2 Jan 2001 14:12:54 +0000 (IST), Mandar Mitra wrote:

>> if you have errors on the drive, mounting the drive and writing to it
>> can destroy no only what you add, but also whatever you already have there.
>
>That's what I was afraid of... thanks. 
>
>
>> any errors on the other devices ? (i.e. the primary drive partitions?)
>
>No, /dev/hda1 always mounts cleanly. 
>
>I don't know about IRQs, pio vs. DMA and such, so I don't know if the 
>following lines from the log indicate the source of the problem:
>
>kernel: PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39 
>kernel: PIIX4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later 
>kernel:     ide0: BM-DMA at 0xfcf0-0xfcf7, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:DMA 
>kernel:     ide1: BM-DMA at 0xfcf8-0xfcff, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio 
>kernel: hda: FUJITSU MPC3032AT, ATA DISK drive 
>kernel: hdb: SAMSUNG SV4084D, ATA DISK drive 
>kernel: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 
>kernel: hda: FUJITSU MPC3032AT, 3093MB w/0kB Cache, CHS=838/120/63 
>kernel: hdb: SAMSUNG SV4084D, 38928MB w/444kB Cache, CHS=4962/255/63 
>
>
>The details of the second disk: 40 Gb partitioned into 20 + 10 + 10
>(and an extra 128Mb swap). fsck appears to find errors on the three 
>partitions more or less at random.
>
>Mandar.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>





_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to