Another stupid question...did you kill -HUP the dhcpd after making the
change?
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Chris Harvey wrote:
> I wondered that..
>
> > Is it possible that one of the addresses you've assigned for DHCP
> > assignment is in use on another box?
> >
>
> I did have the DHCP range as 10.1.1.10 - 10.1.1.100 and I had another
> machine on the Network using the 10.1.1.10 address.. so made the range
> 10.1.1.50 - 10.1.1.60 just keep the complexity down.
>
> Still didn't work...
>
> This is what I have in my dhcpd.conf file
>
> subnet 10.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> range dynamic-bootp 10.1.1.50 10.1.1.60;
> default-lease-time 600;
> max-lease-time 7200;
> option subnet-mask 255.0.0.0;
> option broadcast-address 10.1.1.255;
> option routers 10.1.1.1;
> option domain-name-servers 10.1.1.1;
> option domain-name "e-harvey.com";
> }
> subnet 208.45.64.0 netmask 255.255.254.0 {
> }
>
> Anything look obviously wrong?
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
