"Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 11 Feb 2001, Harry Putnam wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > Now I'm seeing some more confusing phenomena. My firewall is
> > apparently blocking something involved in this transmission. Or at
> > least I see packets being blocked going out eth0. (My internet
> > connection). It seems this conversation between two machines on the
> > local lan should take place soley on eth1. And in fact I don't think
> > that `smbclient' command would return any information if it was being
> > sent over eth0.
> >
> > But every time I send the smbclient -L -N chub I get a packet blocked
> > at the firewall on eth0, is that normal? Syslog item:
> >
> Yes, it is normal, unless you edit /etc/smb.conf, and specify the
> network to use. smbclient is asking the machine it is trying to talk to
> to identify itself, so it know where to send its request. It is kind of
> like doing a DNS query.
OK, now I understand a little better.
> >
> > Something has changed but I can't tell what. I was able to get feed
> > back from the smbclient command but cannot now.
> >
> > # smbclient -L -N chub
> > SSL: Error error setting CA cert locations: error:00000000::lib(0)
> >:func(0) :reason(0)
> > trying default locations.
> > added interface ip=206.117.4.49 bcast=206.117.4.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
> > added interface ip=192.168.xxx bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
> > Packet send failed to 206.117.4.255(137) ERRNO=Operation not permitted
> > Connection to -N failed
> > [206:root]>~
> > #
> >
> This is because you change the option order. The -L must be follower by
> the machine name. Because you put the -N option after the -L option,
> smbclient is looking for a machine named -N. Dumb, I know. I have
> never tried it, but I am guessing you actualy could have a Windows
> machine named -N...
Yikes .. I should have spotted that ...Connection to -N failed.
Using the right order I get a connection but still the shares are
denied:
$ smbclient -N -L chub
SSL: Error error setting CA cert locations: error:00000000::lib(0)
:func(0) :reason(0)
trying default locations.
added interface ip=206.xxx.xxx bcast=206.xxx.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
added interface ip=192.168.xxx bcast=192.168.xx.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
Error returning browse list: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess (Access denied.)
Server Comment
--------- -------
CHUB
Workgroup Master
--------- -------
WORKGROUP CHUB
Any ideas what else to try? Do you still think it may be a version
problem?
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
