Um.. I don't think the one file is that big... considering the fact that
MS has enough common sense to seperate each applet into its own
application. I'm talking about this:
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 13755112 Oct 6 19:38
/usr/local/netscape/netscape
That's the whole program.. browser, mail/news, composer (composter as I
like to call it.. POS), address book, etc... all in one. They still have
the same bugs in it since when I first used it.
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> you should see IE, it's 70MB! 110 or something like that for a full
> install. You know if it's bloated it's Microsoft.
>
>
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Statux wrote:
>
> > Through it all, what did you expect for a 13-14MB binary that contains
> > every component of the suite? :P
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Thomas Duterme wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm fed up with netscape..the default browser that came with RH 7.0. If I open
>up too many windows, it freezes and I have to kill everything before loading it up
>again...its a resource hog and I want something slimmer. It exhibits a lot of other
>annoying behavior too..
> > >
> > > I would even risk, (no bring it on!!!) saying that the default browser that
>comes with Windows performs better than Redhat's default.
> > >
> > > Does anyone use anything else that has the same functionality (no I don't want
>to use Lynx...its not compatible with a lot of sites out there) but isn't as fat as
>netscape?
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > > -Thomas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
-Statux
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
