Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 10:04:14PM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 08:28:47PM -0400, Bruce A. Mallett wrote:
> > > > I think that this is a KDE-only thing when using the new QT-2.3.0.
> > >
> > > Is this true? All the docs I find, are from the KDE crowd, but nowhere
> > > do I find that KDE is a requirement, which would seem to be a strange
> > > requirement. Can anyone shed light on this? Why would an X extension
> > > be dependent on KDE???
> >
> > It isn't, but it's the first commonly used software to take advantage
> > of it.
>
> Does this mean individual apps need to be written so as to take
> advantage of this?
_Something_ needs to take advantage of it, but it doesn't need to be
on the application level: If done in gtk, Motif and QT, it would cover
many applications without modifications.
> I wouldn't think so, but if so, which ones have it now? Meaning
> non-KDE apps.
Can't remember any - I've seen versions of gtk do it, but those are
development versions.
> In summary, S3Virge + X4.0.3 (w/ RENDER initialized) = no AA using
> Mozilla w/ TTFs.
Mozilla does it's own thing (well, HTML rendering at least) without
help from external libraries, so they would need to add support for it
in the browser itself.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
