>
> What does your routing table look like for each setup? Are you using
> the same interface to reach both gateways? Are both gateways the same
> device?
Yes, and Yes..
>
> I would need to know more about your setup, but the gateway could be set
> up so that packets from 44.0.0.0/8 can only connect to other 44.0.0.0/8
> addresses. If this is the case, and the gateway is the same machine for
> both networks, you should be able to add a virtual interface, so that
> you have 142.176.139.107 for eth0, and 44.135.34.210 for eth0:1. You
> would configure thing so that the 44.0.0.0 network uses eth0:1 with
> gateway 44.135.34.201, and the default route uses eth0 and gateway
> 142.1786.139.106.
That is what I was thnking of. Using an alias as I did once before. I guess
the reason why I am wondering about that is because a few days ago I took
Redhat7.1 down (on the machine) and installed Slackware using the same
appplication files and both addresses work to either the commerical world or
the ampr.org world. That really confused me. So, I am now back to RedHat7.1
and going to give it another try. If it is absolutely necessary for the
alias interface then I will pop that in this afternoon depending on my lawn
chores.. I have lots of 'honey-do's' as well <hi>..
>
> Now, if you use different interfaces for the two different IPs, then it
> is ever simpler.
>
> Mikkel
--
Ted Gervais
Coldbrook, Nova Scotia Canada.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
