David Talkington wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > >> I'm just not sure what is the best way to name systems on the private side > >> of our LAN. We tried using just single names but some programs seem to have > >> problems with it. Like NIS and SendMail. What is the best way to name > >> systems on a LAN behind a firewall that don't have internet names? > > You can call them anything you like, but if you expect sendmail to > recognize them, you'll have to set up and properly configure a private > DNS server. MX records are required for that to work. Most other > traffic (file transfers, logins, and whatnot) don't need that > complexity; you can just populate /etc/hosts on your workstations and > be happy. > > - -d > > - -- > David Talkington > http://www.spotnet.org
Hello, I think the user may need to setup DHCP Server... Edward. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
