Problem solved. One must compile the kernel first (make bzimage) before one can compile modules.
It would've been handy if I just could have recompiled the modules for the kernel installed from RPM... Regards, Peter On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:49:32PM +0200, Peter Peltonen wrote: > I've updated my RH72 box with the following kernel packages: > > --<snip>-- > [root@pihlaja linux]# rpm -qa |grep kernel > kernel-2.4.7-10 > kernel-headers-2.4.9-13 > kernel-doc-2.4.9-13 > kernel-source-2.4.9-13 > kernel-BOOT-2.4.9-13 > kernel-2.4.9-13 > [root@pihlaja linux]# uname -a > Linux pihlaja 2.4.9-13 #1 Tue Oct 30 20:05:14 EST 2001 i686 unknown > --</snip>-- > > I tried recompiling the modules (I only added the support for NTFS as a > module) with `make dep; make clean; make modules` but I receive the > following error about missing compile.h: > > --<snip>-- > sysinfo.c:11:27: linux/compile.h: No such file or directory > sysinfo.c: In function `svr4_sysinfo': > sysinfo.c:86: `UTS_VERSION' undeclared (first use in this function) > sysinfo.c:86: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > sysinfo.c:86: for each function it appears in.) > make[2]: *** [sysinfo.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.9-13/abi/svr4' > make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_svr4] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.9-13/abi' > make: *** [_mod_abi] Error 2 > --</snip>-- > > I checked my 2.4.13 kernel sources (upnacked from tarball) and I found a > linux/compile.h in there. Why is there not one in the sources/headers > installed from RPM? > > I haven't recompiled the kernel itself -- this shouldn't be a problem, > right? > > Regards, > Peter > > > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
