-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 cameron wrote:
>I haven't read the entire thread so this might have been mentioned, but I >read in The Register not long ago that an American senator (SC or SD) has >been trying to pass a bill to make it illegal to distribute unlicensed >software. His campaign was largely funded by Aol Time Warner. Apparently >it is unlikely the bill will pass, except for benign portions of it, but its >frightening to consider who would now gain control the server side if it >did. I smell a misinterpretation here. In the first place, there's no unlicensed software involved here. In the second place, this sounds like it may have been yet another attempt to curb piracy (or attach more penalties to it). But do send a link if you find some hard info. - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp - -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPEqLlr9BpdPKTBGtEQLmQwCg91QH4lwb0QnxVSpj9jMPHF9hg/MAn1Ih GMUMf9E2jmB82I41byhHjasc =vZsK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
