-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 20:15 * Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) said.... > That shouldn't be an issue if Red Hat is kept as a subsidiary of AOL or at > least as a semi-autonomous company like Netscape. In any case, I'm not saying > I'm really excited by the news. All I'm saying is that, given the track > record of Red Hat so far I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. > As I said in my original message, if they do something I don't like I will > _then_ jump to Debian most likely. In the meantime, all I'll do is _prepare_ > for the eventuality. That's all. I agree, we can't possibly know untill we know. I think a little preperation/research is a sensible compromise between an outright (and thus far unwarranted) run for the hills and a 'whatever' attitude. > people behind them. If knowledgeable Red Hat employees that I respect start > leaving the company, I may switch to Debian then. By the way, Slashdot is > publishing some comments on Alan Cox's threat to leave Red Hat if they are > bought by AOL. Yeah I saw that, the plot thickens huh? - -- Nick Wilson Tel: +45 3325 0688 Fax: +45 3325 0677 Web: www.explodingnet.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8TGtRHpvrrTa6L5oRAtFCAJ4hXWM2mOkmWvVznmBz9LmoFTcirQCgsET/ Zwoa2NKFP91YxuzJBwurZXQ= =lfcg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
