On 13 Mar 2002, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote:
> The only reason for releasing the package is to avoid confusion with
> people who think they need a new one. They don't. The old ones are
> just as good...
Trond, please forgive me to keep that issue up but I disagree
again..
RedHat should changed their kernel-headers naming scheme for RH6.2
updates (as in "kernel-headers-2.2.19.i386.rpm") to make it sub-release
independent or they should be releasing the correct package. You just
can't release something with an update and take it away with the next
update..
Either RH EOL's 6.2 (like what happened with 5.2 in december,
which is just fine, btw..) or RH has to support 6.2 -correctly- and be
consistent with the updates that come out for a supported distribution.
The same holds true for the kernel*2.2.19-6.2.15*sparc64.rpm packages.
I don't mind these packages coming out -after- the i*86 packages
since most of RH's customers run RH on x86, I just want to make sure that
these packages will be in the pipe.. If you got things right for
2.2.19-6.2.7 and 2.2.19-6.2.12, please do the same for 2.2.19-6.2.15.
> > Is there a specific place (bugzilla, list, whatever,..) where to
> > report packaging problems?
>
> Bugzilla would be it.
I will do that right away. Thank you for the hint.
> --
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,
Vincent S. Cojot, Computer Engineering. STEP project. _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Comite Micro-Informatique. _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,.
Linux Xview/OpenLook resources page _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'
http://step.polymtl.ca/~coyote _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
They cannot scare me with their empty spaces
Between stars - on stars where no human race is
I have it in me so much nearer home
To scare myself with my own desert places. - Robert Frost
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
