-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>>I'm not sure whether any of you guys have played with the new >>bind/named/dhcp combination yet, but I upgraded about a month ago because I >>read somewhere that the new versions would allow DHCP to automatically add >>dynamic address clients to the named cache. > >I don't know how to do this, but if you'll post what information you *do* >have then I'll catch up and help you figure this out. I'd really like to >get this working at home; besides, we can't have something actually work on >XP (rare enough in itself) but not in Linux, can we? Maybe I'm dense, but could someone explain to me what problem this solves? The assignments are dynamic, but the mapping between the IP address and its A record -- which is what DNS does -- is static, and has nothing to do with whether the address is currently in use. So I guess I don't see the point here, unless perhaps we're trying to alias DHCP_HOSTNAME to an IP address on-the-fly, which sounds dicey, since you'd be introducing potential namespace conflicts. - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPLNqmr9BpdPKTBGtEQLuNACeJaXvkx2jSb2z41KO0mwxqsduLi8AoLSB g66i+X2ZYpOL9mWwnkj8V8/W =DZtE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
