no, but if you want to change it you can modify the source for gcc. Also "historical reasons" sometimes really means: - Well know standard - Backwards compatibility - Other possible dependencies that we don't know about and don't want to break - If it ain't broke then don't try to fix it
Robert Fausey wrote: > Does anyone know the reason why the default executable name for gcc is > a.out? I did a search and all I could find was for historical reasons, is > there more documentaion about this. > > > Rob Fausey. > > > > > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
