On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 14:00 -0500, Darrel Goeddel wrote: > I am also not really concerned about it. Shall we give this a whirl in the > lspp kernel (since its users are currently exercising the problematic code > path) and include push it through the audit git tree if it works nicely? > Note that this would replace the band-aid patch that is currently included > in the lspp kernel. Anyone object (or have a patch using the callback > method)?
No objection from me. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
