[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:23:50 BST, Tim Waugh said: >>Small thing: should the daemon be called just 'access', or would >>'lspp-access' be better? > > lspp-access, definitely. That way, if one of my not-so-LSPP-savvy co-workers > encounters it, they won't mistake it for that other daemon that's running > and providing accessibility functions for the disabled... >
Just to clarify, that program is not a daemon. It happens to live in the directory /usr/lib/cups/daemon/ and is exec'ed by the cups daemon when it needs to verify access is permitted to a given local printer. I doubt that it would be confused for an accessibility program. That said, I have no problem with changing the name. -matt -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
