On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 08:36 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Stephen Smalley wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 23:47 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I was playing with mounting filesystems specifying a context to the > >> mount command, and came across this limitation: > >> > >> # mount -o loop,context=root:object_r:root_t:s0:c1,c4 foo /mnt > >> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, > >> missing codepage or other error > >> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try > >> dmesg | tail or so > >> > >> On the other hand, this works: > >> > >> # mount -o loop,context=root:object_r:root_t:s0:c1.c4 foo /mnt > >> # > >> > >> The "c1,c4" part of the context in the 1st command above is probably > >> being misinterpeted by the mount command, which uses comma to separate > >> options. Thus, it must be seeing a separate "c4" option to the > >> filesystem which is false. Is there a way to work around this? > >> > > > > See: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=selinux&m=115944972832553&w=2 > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=selinux&m=115944972813825&w=2 > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=selinux&m=115944972820896&w=2 > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=selinux&m=115944975417952&w=2 > > > > The kernel patch was upstreamed. Dan, did the mount and nfsmount patch > > get included into Fedora and RHEL? If not, they need to be. > > > > > Please open a bugzilla on these. As we need bugzilla's in order to get > these updates into the release. > Please cc me on the bugzilla.
Thiago, are you opening a bugzilla on the mount and nfsmount patches? Eric, is the kernel patch already queued for the RHEL kernel? -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
