Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 10:41 -0500, Linda Knippers wrote: > >>Stephen Smalley wrote: >> >> >>>Version of policycoreutils-newrole and selinux-policy-mls? >>>Contents of /etc/pam.d/newrole? >> >>Sorry, I'd mentioned in the call that I was running the latest from >>Dan's people page but omitted it from the mail. I have these >>rpms. >> >>policycoreutils-1.33.2-2.el5 >>policycoreutils-newrole-1.33.2-2.el5 >>selinux-policy-mls-2.4.5-3.el5 >>selinux-policy-2.4.5-3.el5 >> >>/etc/pam.d/newrole has this: >>#%PAM-1.0 >>auth include system-auth >>account include system-auth >>password include system-auth >>session include system-auth >>session optional pam_xauth.so > > > I would have expected the latter to include: > session required pam_namespace.so unmnt_remnt no_unmount_on_close
I added that line but I don't see any difference in behavior. I added it at the end. Does the location matter? (Sorry for the dumb pam question). -- ljk -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
