--- Darrel Goeddel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The theory is that these files can contain the > lables up to systemhigh. The > mere existence of the label is classified just like > data having that label. Prior evaluations have not been held to this constraint. The existance of a container is evidence of content, but does not disclose that content. The existance of a name is evidence of an object, but does not necessarily disclose characteristics of the object. Consider the pentagon. You know its name, I know its name, and we both know it contains classified information. It is not, even under the Patriot Act, treason to shout "Pentagon" in the international terminal at Dullas Airport. Further, there is a long tradition of obfuscation in the choice of "label" names, including such well known examples as "tank" and "bazooka". Casey Schaufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
