On Apr 24, 2008, at 10:54 PM, Dave Beckett wrote:
Michael Stahl wrote:
...
PS: just for the record, i would find it useful if there were a
tarball of librdf that does not contain raptor and rasqal
I've been wondering about doing that. Does anyone else rely on it?
The consequence would be you'd need to build & install raptor and
rasqal first, and they'd have to be compatible versions. The
redland all-in-one tarball guarantees there are compatible ones
around.
To the extent that "compatible" versions of raptor pop out on a
different schedule, I'd prefer one tarball per library, assume the
user/builder can read and comprehend directions regarding the
dependencies, and ensure some level of sanity checks into autoconf for
those who fail. Those who want the convenience of the all-in-one may
ultimately be downstream consumers of binary packages anyway. (Okay,
that last bit is wild speculation on my part)
-john
_______________________________________________
redland-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.librdf.org/mailman/listinfo/redland-dev
