The following issue has been SUBMITTED. ====================================================================== http://bugs.librdf.org/mantis/view.php?id=413 ====================================================================== Reported By: thomasvs Assigned To: ====================================================================== Project: Redland Language Bindings Issue ID: 413 Category: Reproducibility: have not tried Severity: minor Priority: normal Status: new Binding Language (java, perl, php, python, ruby, tcl): python ====================================================================== Date Submitted: 2011-01-22 20:32 Last Modified: 2011-01-22 20:32 ====================================================================== Summary: Licensing of source code is unclear to distributions Description: During the review for Fedora packaging, the following comment was made:
* There are many files under perl/ and php/ directories, which have the license text: # This package is Free Software or Open Source available under the # following licenses (these are alternatives): # 1. GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) # 2. GNU General Public License (GPL) # 3. Mozilla Public License (MPL) These do not state any license versions. It would be good to ask upstream. On the other hand, for example, python/RDF.py says that it is LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ or ASL 2.0 or MIT, which makes the licensing scenario even more complicated. (See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659082) Maybe the source code should be reviewed and the licensing situation cleared up? ====================================================================== Issue History Date Modified Username Field Change ====================================================================== 2011-01-22 20:32 thomasvs New Issue ====================================================================== _______________________________________________ redland-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.librdf.org/mailman/listinfo/redland-dev
