Well, we were right back then.

Frankly, it annoys me to see a tribute to Yawkee hanging from Fenway.
He did nothing but bring us losers.

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Matt & Olga
McSorley<[email protected]> wrote:
> It would be 1999-2002 all over again on this list. Remember the bad old
> days?
>
> -- Matt
>
> --- On Mon, 6/8/09, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Ray Salemi <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Trade Buchholz
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, June 8, 2009, 4:56 PM
>
>
> I always wonder what would happen if we were uncomfortable letting Sox
> management sort this out.
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Matt & Olga
> McSorley<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Theo's built two World Series winners. I'm perfectly comfortable letting
>> him
>> sort this out.
>>
>> The only thing he needs advice with is signing free-agent shortstops. He
>> clearly hasn't got the hang of that yet.
>>
>> -- Matt
>>
>> --- On Mon, 6/8/09, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> From: Ray Salemi <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Trade Buchholz
>> To: [email protected]
>> Date: Monday, June 8, 2009, 2:52 PM
>>
>>
>> Oh, he is definitely post-steroid.
>>
>> I'm just wondering about the rest of baseball.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Beaudoin, John<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, duh, look at David Ortiz.  Don't even look at his numbers.  Just
>>> look at 'him'.  What would you call it?
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
>>> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 2:33 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: Trade Buchholz
>>>
>>>
>>> We're in post-steroid baseball?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Beaudoin, John<[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 8HR and 37 RBI's doesn't seem like something to lust over
>>>>
>>>> Aren't we 1/3 into the season?
>>>>
>>>> 3 x those numbers are 24HR and 11RBI's.  Well, okay, the RBI's look
>>>> really
>>>> good.  Okay, I'm on the fence.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Aha!!!!!  And I was caught up in the steroid era HR numbers.  Those
>>>> numbers
>>>> are great for post-steroid baseball.  I've come full circle in this
>>>> e-mail
>>>> Go get'em. I've never been a big fan of Buchholz.  Seems frail like
>>>> Dennis
>>>> Boyd.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>>
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Gendron
>>>> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 2:11 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Trade Buchholz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As much as I like the guy, we have to face the fact that the most likely
>>>> trade bait in the Red Sox organization is Clay Buchholz.  If the Sox
>>>> need
>>>> another big bat, they are not going to get it by packaging up Papi,
>>>> Penny
>>>> or
>>>> Smoltz.  But Buchholz is in BIG demand and will bring a lot in return.
>>>> The
>>>> name that has surfaced lately is Matt Holliday.  What do you think about
>>>> a
>>>> Buchholz for Holliday trade?  Holliday has a .384 OBP with 8 HRs and 37
>>>> RBI.  Those are numbers that Theo lusts after.  I would not be surprised
>>>> to
>>>> see something like that happen as we approach the All-Star break.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide"
>>> www.fpgasimulation.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide"
>> www.fpgasimulation.com
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide"
> www.fpgasimulation.com
>
>
>
> >
>



-- 
Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide"
www.fpgasimulation.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to