Browser Competition on the Merits: We Support the EC Case Against Microsoft

:

We support the European Commission’s efforts to restore competition on the
merits in the market for Web browser software products.
 Contact Info Website:
http://www.unclaw.com/chin/scholarship/m...<http://www.unclaw.com/chin/scholarship/microsoft.htm>
 Recent NewsThe U.S. Settlement Failed to Restore Competition on the Merits
in the Browser Market

• Since 1998, Microsoft has tied Internet Explorer to Windows through
various contractual and technological means.
• Despite having succeeded at trial in proving all of the factual predicates
needed to support an antitrust tying claim, government prosecutors abandoned
the tying claim in 2001, seeking a speedy settlement of the case.
• While the settlement in the U.S. case helped open up some distribution
channels for third-party browsers, the harms to competition in the market
for Web browsers were never directly addressed. To this day, consumers do
not have a neutral choice of Web browser.
• Through technological superiority, Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome have
subsequently achieved substantial market shares, but they continue to face a
market skewed by Microsoft’s illegal tying practices.

Microsoft’s Code Fallacy and the U.S. Settlement

• According to Microsoft, antitrust law should never require changes to the
design of software products, because this will chill the freedom of
programmers to innovate. One such innovation was in writing the shared
blocks of code that support both operating system and Web browsing functions
in Windows.
• Microsoft's argument might make sense if its freedom to design software
products ended when the last line of code was written. But a software
product does not consist of code. If it did, you would own the Windows code
on your computer and could sell copies of that code with impunity.
• Actually, what you own is a license consisting of certain legal rights
derived from Microsoft's copyright in the Windows code, together with the
technological ability to use the code with your computer in the exercise of
those rights.
• As the sole author of the license contract, Microsoft enjoys considerable
freedom in defining the extent to which consumers are able to use the
Windows code. But freedom of contract is expressly limited by the antitrust
laws.
• The courts therefore had authority to order Microsoft to license and
distribute its software so as to offer a neutral choice of Web browser. As
Ed Felten showed at trial, Microsoft could easily have done so without
undoing its programming innovations. Instead, the U.S. settlement endorsed
Microsoft’s code fallacy and granted Microsoft a special immunity to license
Windows under contractual terms that destroy freedom of competition in the
browser market.

What’s at Stake

• There will never be a perfect Web browser. Consumers will always demand
improvements. The market will be fully efficient in supplying those
improvements only if there is full and free competition on the merits for
Web browsers. Even though Web browsers are available for free, inefficiency
in the Web browser market has resulted in security hazards, productivity
losses, and other significant economic harms, and will continue to do so.

Law Review and Op-Ed Articles on Microsoft’s Illegal Tying Conduct
http://www.unclaw.com/chin/scholarship/microsoft.htm

Mozilla to Weigh in On EU’s Microsoft Case (CNET, 2/10/09)
http://snurl.com/cod52

Google Can Join EU’s Browser Case Against Microsoft (Bloomberg, 2/25/09)
http://snurl.com/cod4i

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=54708743186

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Our Web site: http://www.RefreshAustin.org/

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Refresh Austin" group.

[ Posting ]
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Job-related postings should follow 
http://groups.google.com/group/Refresh-Austin/web/refresh-austins-job-posting-guidelines.
We do not accept job posts from recruiters.

[ Unsubscribe ]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]

[ More Info ]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Refresh-Austin
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to