PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1030 *** shadow/1030 Sun May 20 17:23:31 2001 --- shadow/1030.tmp.3201 Sat Sep 8 15:46:07 2001 *************** *** 1,19 **** ! Bug#: 1030 ! Product: Regexp ! Version: unspecified ! Platform: PC ! OS/Version: All ! Status: NEW ! Resolution: ! Severity: Normal ! Priority: Medium ! Component: Other ! AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! URL: ! Cc: ! Summary: {n,m} notation failure in org.apache.regexp.RE.match ! I asked jakarta-regexp-1.2 to test the string "111111" against the regexp pattern "^\d{0,5}(\.\d\d)?$". I believe this string should have failed, but the method org.apache.regexp.RE.match() returned "true" when it should have --- 1,19 ---- ! +============================================================================+ ! | {n,m} notation failure in org.apache.regexp.RE.match | ! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | Bug #: 1030 Product: Regexp | ! | Status: ASSIGNED Version: unspecified | ! | Resolution: Platform: PC | ! | Severity: Normal OS/Version: All | ! | Priority: Medium Component: Other | ! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ! | Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ! | CC list: Cc: | ! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | URL: | ! +============================================================================+ ! | DESCRIPTION | I asked jakarta-regexp-1.2 to test the string "111111" against the regexp pattern "^\d{0,5}(\.\d\d)?$". I believe this string should have failed, but the method org.apache.regexp.RE.match() returned "true" when it should have *************** *** 38,40 **** --- 38,44 ---- abbba false false I got these results with Sun's Linux 1.3 SDK, and Win NT 1.3 SDK. + + ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-09-08 15:46 ------- + This is definitly a problem. + Have not nailed down exactly why its happening though.
