PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2371

*** shadow/2371 Wed Jun 27 14:38:43 2001
--- shadow/2371.tmp.3296        Sat Sep  8 15:58:08 2001
***************
*** 2,9 ****
  | "foo:\b" fails to match "foo: bar"                                         |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 2371                        Product: Regexp                  |
! |       Status: NEW                         Version: unspecified             |
! |   Resolution:                            Platform: PC                      |
  |     Severity: Normal                   OS/Version: Windows NT/2K           |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: Other                   |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--- 2,9 ----
  | "foo:\b" fails to match "foo: bar"                                         |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 2371                        Product: Regexp                  |
! |       Status: RESOLVED                    Version: unspecified             |
! |   Resolution: DUPLICATE                  Platform: PC                      |
  |     Severity: Normal                   OS/Version: Windows NT/2K           |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: Other                   |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
***************
*** 27,30 ****
          catch (RESyntaxException e) { return; }
          System.out.println("match returned " + re.match("foo: bar"));
      }
! }
--- 27,35 ----
          catch (RESyntaxException e) { return; }
          System.out.println("match returned " + re.match("foo: bar"));
      }
! }
! 
! ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-09-08 15:58 -------
! 
! 
! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 986 ***

Reply via email to