Asked the same thing awhile back and the response was the jakarta stuff is better (their track record would not call that in to question) and of course it does not require a 1.4 JDK. One thing that did bug me about the build-in was that the logger did not take an object as a constructor so you had to give it the class object instead. Seemed like an annoying step backward. Anyway, we are sticking with log4j for the time being.
-----Original Message----- From: Dubois, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:02 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Jakarta RegEx vs Java Regex What are the advantages of using the Jakarta's RegEx package versus the Java built-in RegEx, now that Java has built-in RegEx's? Thanks! Jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
