Gustavo,
Unfortunately, as Patrik noted, the document needs a normative reference
to a matching algorithm. You have stated that you will bring that to
the attention of the appropriate ICANN folks, but I do not see how this
document can move forward without that.
It is a technical issue and affects interoperability, which makes a
resolution essential.
I’m interested in other opinions but I do not believe this document
can move forward without this.
Jim
On 16 Jun 2016, at 19:35, Gustavo Lozano wrote:
Dear chairs, working group,
I have not received any further comments on the draft
(draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec).
I think that version 01 of the draft
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-01)
is ready for publication.
Regards,
Gustavo
On 6/3/16, 11:50, "James Galvin" <[email protected]> wrote:
I want to remind the working group that we have the following
unresolved
comments regarding draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec. We need to
address
these comments before this document can move forward.
And please note that draft-ietf-regext-launchphase is dependent on
this
document. It is ready for publication but can not move forward until
we
can move both it and tmch-func-spec together.
Thanks,
Jim
On 23 Apr 2016, at 1:53, Patrik Fältström wrote:
Comments (some of this can also be fund in SSAC document SAC-060 23
July 2013):
1. It is not clear how permutations of strings are to be calculated
(by whom, and how) in the case confusability risks might arise. For
example by the use of language tables or other mechanisms like LGRs.
2. The term "leftmost" is a bit confusing when talking about labels
in
DNS. I propose using "first" as in logical order.
3. The matching algorithm is not described, who is implementing it
etc.
4. There are no instructions on how to handle cases where the
matching
algorithm in TMCH is different from matching algorithm one "expect"
("one" as in the trademark holder).
Patrik
On 22 Apr 2016, at 22:39, [email protected] wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions
of
the IETF.
Title : ICANN TMCH functional specifications
Author : Gustavo Lozano
Filename : draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-00.txt
Pages : 60
Date : 2016-04-22
Abstract:
This document describes the requirements, the architecture and
the
interfaces between the ICANN Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) and
Domain Name Registries as well as between the ICANN TMCH and Domain
Name Registrars for the provisioning and management of domain names
during Sunrise and Trademark Claims Periods.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-00
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
