All,
>> I've been giving some thought to the possibility of writing up a proposal
>> for a generic organization
>>object that can be compared to the proposal we have for a reseller object
>>since the topic came up
>>at last week's meeting.
>
> […]
> > We could add an IANA registry for organization identifier types.
> >
> > Is something like this worth considering? It looks pretty simple to me.
>
> I do agree with your idea, Scott.
I also agree to this idea Scott.
> For me, philosophically it sounds strange to define a reseller object,
> alongside domains, hosts and contacts, where there is no registrar
> object. It would look like a missing piece in the puzzle.
It’s indeed strange now you mention this. I presume its historically so,
because registries have, in some way, implemented a registrar object
into their system, without giving an EPP interface to handle changes
to this object (other than extend on your own, or through a webinterface,
nobody cares about…). And think about the abuse contact (ICANN).
> So having a generic organisation would be useful to code for many
> cases, and do not emphasize resellers as being a more important
> objects than others.
>
> And +1 for the IANA registry on types/roles.
+1 for the IANA registry too.
Best regards,
Marc
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
