Gould, James <jgo...@verisign.com> 2017-08-03 18:13 > I believe TLD level EPP policies is relevant, but is best suited for > something outside of the Launch Phase or Registry Fee command-response > extensions. An example policy EPP mapping is the Registry Mapping > (https://www.verisign.com/assets/epp-sdk/verisign_epp-extension_registry_v00.html) > that does provide launch phase schedule information at the TLD (zone) level. > Something like the Registry Mapping with extensions to define the features > and policies of EPP extensions like the Launch Phase or Registry Fee > extensions is best suited for defining and discovering the features and > policies.
I agree with Roger that auto-discovery should be a problem to be tackled and replied with solutions. For TLD phases but also for a lot of other "knobs" and options in EPP. And I totally agree with James on the Registry Mapping extension, that could be suited for this task. I would even be very happy if VeriSign could push forward to make this EPP extension a standard, to be used by many registries. -- Patrick Mevzek _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
