Re: [regext] Preliminary agenda

Fri, 27 Oct 2017 04:54:08 -0700

Hi all,

Since James was the only one voicing his opinion, this is now the preliminary agenda that will be posted to the datatracker.

We’re on time, so if anybody wants items changed, please let us know.

Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT)
IETF 100, Singapore, Agenda

Co-chairs: Jim Galvin, Antoin Verschuren

Mailinglist: [email protected]

Update session, first hour:

1. Welcome and Introductions (5 minutes)

   i.   Jabber scribe
   ii.  Notes scribe
   iii. NOTE WELL


2. Existing Document Status

   i. Publication requested, status (1 minute)

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-launchphase/       


3. Fee Extension (Roger Carney, 5 minutes)
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees/


4. Validate Extension (Roger Carney, 5 minutes)
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-validate/


5. Review of milestones status (15 minutes)

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/regext/about/

    i.   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-change-poll/
         Ready?
    ii.  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token/
         Ready?
    iii. 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol/
         Review?
    iv.  
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration/
         Informational?
    v.   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-org/
         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-org-ext/
         Review?


7. RDAP jcr (Andrew Newton, 10 minutes)
   
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-newton-rdap-jcr/


8. RDAP partial response and reverse search (Mario Loffredo, 20 minutes)

    
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging/


9. Interim meeting feedback (5 min.)


10. AOB


Working session, second hour:


1. Validate draft (Roger Carney, 20 minustes)

2. Registry Mapping and Launch Phase Listing (Roger Carney, 40 minustes)

Regards,

Jim and Antoin


- -- 
Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392






Op 20 okt. 2017, om 14:07 heeft Gould, James <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven:

Antoin,
 
I believe it’s best to knock off the update session first and then spend as much time as we can in the working session. 
  
—
 
JG

<image001.png>

James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
[email protected]

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com
 
From: regext <[email protected]> on behalf of Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, October 20, 2017 at 7:46 AM
To: Registration Protocols Extensions <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Preliminary agenda
 

Hi All,

We’re early this time, but please find our preliminary agenda for Singapore attached.
We have one 2 hour slot in Singapore, that we will use for both the working session and the updates.
The questions we have for the group:

-Would you like to have the working session first or the regular update session first?
 Pros for having the working session first would be that we could have an update during the regular session, but the con would be that this would start the update session later.
 Pros for having the update session first would be that we could spend all excess time to the working session.
 Please let us know what you think would be best.

-If there are any more agenda items, please let us know.



Regards,

Jim and Antoin

- --
Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392






Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to