On Sun, Jan 14, 2018, at 20:31, John Levine wrote: > There's little reason to put an ANAME into a TLD zone file.
Stéphane's draft is not tied to any level of the DNS tree. My comment was in that sense and based on previous discussions of various RRs in EPP extensions. > With respect to DNAMEs at the top level, someone else noted that the > root zone isn't managed the same way as TLDs, I think that would be me. > Since you can get the effect of a DNAME in the root zone > by putting a DNAME at the apex of a TLD as Taiwan has done, if people > want more root-ish DNAMEs it might be more productive to consider how > to invent a policy to allow a DNAME-only TLD if you're not a ccTLD. But this won't be ontopic in this WG. -- Patrick Mevzek _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
