> -----Original Message----- > From: regext [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Galvin > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 8:29 AM > To: Registration Protocols Extensions <[email protected]> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] WGLC: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft- > ietf-regext-change-poll > > The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready > for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Proposed > Standard: > > Change Poll Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-06
Comments: There probably shouldn't be any normative language in the abstract. Please change "MAY" to "may". Section 3.1.2: does the name attribute for the "custom" case identifier have an i18n considerations? Section 5.1: The title of this section is "XML Namespace", but it seems to be conflating a registration request for an XML namespace and the XML Schema described in Section 4. I'm going to recommend registering both the namespace and the schema in the same way it's done in, for example, RFC 5731. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
