Hi Patrick, > >> Registry Mapping, Roger Carney >> Open question on boot strap for registry mapping >> Discussion about how to distribute the data and if it is public at all. >> Question if this data should be in EPP, RDAP or something else. >> Next step: make a draft, adaption > > Why is this not done and discussed on this mailing-list but only during face > to > face meetings and over the phone? I think this excludes some participants and > also lacks any kind of material minutes and searching capabilities.
I think nobody just took the lead to start the discussion in the mailing list, yet? We should not wait for the chairs to start a thread, so let's get started. > >> James Galvin mentions that ICANN has a tech ops groups with many >> registrars present. This group will send documents for >> standardization to the Regext WG. Intense discussion about process >> and involvement. To get standards people need to participate. > > I find that way to work quite worrisome. I do not think this working group > should be rubber stamping documents elaborated elsewhere, even under the best > assumptions for everyone, and even if "everywhere" is also populated by many > people hanging here. > It may be sad that not too many or not enough registrars are on this > mailing-list, > but instead of having the discussions elsewhere, why not encouraging them to > come > here? Each registry should do that for its registrars. > > If I take the latest (only?) example of this, it is the draft about registry > message on maintenance. There was almost no discussion of it here, I was the > only > one to convey some comments/questions that were not acknowledged nor adressed > in any way. It would find it very strange to see it come back and asking for > the working group adoption. I share your opinion. I think it's a good idea to offload the ICANN policy stuff to the techops list, and I think the techops list is a valuable input for regext, but there's little enthusiasm to think about the specs. We need more horsepower, especially from the registrars who benefit most. Pieter
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
