Besides DNSSEC, I'm thinking of NS data and reseller data kind regards
Pieter > On 30 May 2018, at 11:10, Kal Feher <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Pieter, > > could you elaborate on what objects you think might be modified? Are you > thinking of anything other than DNSSEC material? > > delegation of epp to 3rd parties that are unknown to the registry does have > some operational implications that need to be thought through. Although I > suppose this group isnt regops. > > > On 29/5/18 6:13 am, Pieter Vandepitte wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As I see discussions popping up now and then of 3rd party organisations >> having to modify registry objects, wouldn't it be an idea to design >> something like delegated EPP instead of implementing new protocols? >> Something like: a registrar assigns a group to an object, then generates a >> token for the group and shares it with a 3rd party. Could be more or less >> complex, introducing users, etc. >> >> I'm probably reopening old discussions, but maybe worth thinking of. >> >> Pieter >> _______________________________________________ >> regext mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > -- > Kal Feher > Melbourne, Australia > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
