Besides DNSSEC, I'm thinking of NS data and reseller data

kind regards

Pieter


> On 30 May 2018, at 11:10, Kal Feher <i...@feherfamily.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Pieter,
> 
> could you elaborate on what objects you think might be modified? Are you 
> thinking of anything other than DNSSEC material?
> 
> delegation of epp to 3rd parties that are unknown to the registry does have 
> some operational implications that need to be thought through. Although I 
> suppose this group isnt regops.
> 
> 
> On 29/5/18 6:13 am, Pieter Vandepitte wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> As I see discussions popping up now and then of 3rd party organisations 
>> having to modify registry objects, wouldn't it be an idea to design 
>> something like delegated EPP instead of implementing new protocols? 
>> Something like: a registrar assigns a group to an object, then generates a 
>> token for the group and shares it with a 3rd party. Could be more or less 
>> complex, introducing users, etc.
>> 
>> I'm probably reopening old discussions, but maybe worth thinking of.
>> 
>> Pieter
>> _______________________________________________
>> regext mailing list
>> regext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
> 
> -- 
> Kal Feher
> Melbourne, Australia
> 
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to