> -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Campbell <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2018 7:06 PM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Gould, James > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Gould, James > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap- > object-tag-04: (with COMMENT) > > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I'm also a little surprised to see this as a BCP. It seems to define at > least a bit of protocol as part of the "practice". > > ยง3.1: Does the FCFS registration policy allow a potential for squatting or > other malicious behavior?
As described in my reply to Alissa, yes, it does. I suggested adding a contact email address to the registration request to help reduce the risk. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
