On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, at 21:31, James Galvin wrote:
> Please respond to this message on the mailing list and indicate your
> support or questions regarding this charter.
"updates" should be "updated" I think.
And I still think it is too broad, especially "Data formats for files"
(which files? what data? why the format needs a specification and a working
group?).
"Registry mapping" and "Registry transition" will probably seem obscure to
anyone
outside of the working group. I am myself not even sure what it covers or not.
--
Patrick Mevzek
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
