One comment inline below.
On 7 Nov 2018, at 1:00, Gould, James wrote:
There were 3 draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode items brought up by
Gurshabad Grover that I captured from the REGEXT Meeting:
1. Clarifying that it’s up to server policy to define the server
action taken when the verification code grace period expires
* I re-reviewed draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode, and it does
not include any language related to the action taken by the server
when the verification code grace period expires. I believe this can
be addressed by adding the following sentence in the Verification
Profile section (section 2.2) of the draft:
i.
“…the grace period by which the verification code types MUST be
set. It is up to server policy what action to take if the
verification code type is not set by the grace period.”
1. Ensure that the VSP does not modify the data verified after the
verification code is generated
* I’m still not clear what the issue is here, since the role
of the VSP is to perform the verification and to generate the
verification code when the verification has been successfully
completed. The draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode does not define the
interface used by the VSP and does not define the policies of how the
verification is performed.
* Gurshabad, can you share your issue on the list to help
clarify how the draft would address it?
2. Include a HRPC section in draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode
* This is being discussed actively on the list, but at present
I believe that we can address the feedback without adding a new
section to the document. If the IESG changes the default structure of
the document to add a new section, then it can certainly be added.
The co-Chairs would like to remind the working group that if anyone
believes there should be an HRPC section then the action is for that
person to propose the text that would go in an HRPC section. The
working group will then consider that addition as it would the addition
of any other contribution to the document.
Regardless, as JG suggests, he will address the feedback as appropriate
throughout the document.
Thanks,
Antoin and Jim
Let me know if I missed anything and share your feedback on the list
for the items above.
Thanks,
—
JG
[cid:[email protected]]
James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
[email protected]
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
