> -----Original Message----- > From: regext <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Benjamin Kaduk > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 10:07 PM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf- > regext-org-ext-10: (with COMMENT) > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-10: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-org-ext/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for addressing my Discuss points! > > [Original Comment section preserved below] > > Section 1 > > In the business model of domain registration, we usually have 3 roles > of entities: a registrant, a registrar and a registry. There may be > other roles of entities involved in the domain registration process > which are not formally defined, such as resellers, DNS service > operators, privacy proxies, etc. > > nit: Perhaps I am misreading, but are we not going to formally define > these entities in the next paragraph (in which case "yet" might be worth > adding)?
If definitions are needed, it may make sense to cite those described in draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis. The Datatracker says it's in the RFC Editor's AUTH48 state, so it should be available as an RFC in a matter of days. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
