Jim,
Thanks for putting the list together and I look forward to the Doodle poll.
You can remove the following drafts from the list for now until we address the
IPR with draft-gould-carney-regext-registry:
Registry Mapping
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gould-carney-regext-registry/
Launch Phase Policy (Extension of Registry Mapping)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-launch-policy/
I would add the data escrow drafts to the list:
Registry Data Escrow Specification
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arias-noguchi-registry-data-escrow/
Domain Name Registration Data (DNRD) Objects Mapping
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/ draft-arias-noguchi-dnrd-objects-mapping/
I'm in the process of updating the Data Set File Format draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-dataset/ to support a
report file definition, in addition to the existing bulk operation file
defintion. The draft will support an extensible set of file definitions, so if
new file definitions are needed the draft can be used. The definition can be
in a separate file from the data, which is similar to the CSV approach in the
data escrow drafts, or may be combined in the same file as the data, as
currently defined in the existing version of draft-gould-regext-dataset. The
field definitions (domain, host, contact, registrar) can be reused across many
types of definition files. The meta-data about the files can be extensible -
the meta-data for a bulk operation (i.e., bulk command and sub-command, client
identifier, creation date) is different from the meta-data for a report (i.e.,
report type and sub-type, date or date-range, frequency, tld or tlds, account).
Support for a standard report definition file would help in formally defining
the meta-data and format of any report. This would help the registrars to
automate the consumption of any report. An IANA registry could be setup to
register report identifiers and the associated format definitions for both
custom and standardized reports. This draft represents an opportunity for the
working group to create a more generic solution for handling reports and bulk
operations.
—
JG
James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
[email protected]
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>
On 12/7/18, 9:38 AM, "regext on behalf of James Galvin"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
Included below is the list of potential documents and topics this
working group could adopt. The first step in moving forward is to make
sure we have a complete list. We are asking folks to review this list
and make sure we have not missed anything. We are allowing one week for
this review, until Friday 14 December 2018. During this time please do
ask questions about documents or topics.
The next step will be for the working group members to indicate their
top 5 choices of documents to move forward. Recall that 5 is the
maximum number of milestones suggested for us to have open at a time.
If there is discussion to be had about this number please start a new
email thread and we will see where it goes.
We will do this with a Doodle poll. Hopefully you are familiar with
this. We will setup each document as a choice and you’ll be asked to
select up to 5 documents. In Doodle, you can select Yes, No, or
IfNeedBe. You can use the IfNeedBe option to indicate documents that
you support but not as your top 5. We will open this Doodle poll before
the Christmas holiday and leave it open through Friday, 11 January.
That should be plenty of time to get past holiday and vacation time that
many folks will have during this time.
Once we have an ordered list of documents we will announce working group
adoption requests and we will move forward with our work. It’s going
to be a busy year, 2019!
Registry Mapping
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gould-carney-regext-registry/
Registry Reporting Repository
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcpherson-sattler-registry-reporting-repo/
Registry Reporting Structure
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcpherson-sattler-registry-report-structure/
Domain Fee Report
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sattler-registry-domain-fee-report/
Registry Transaction Report
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcpherson-sattler-ry-transaction-report/
Registry Domain Inventory Report
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sattler-registry-domain-inventory-report/
Registry Domain Drop Report
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sattler-registry-domain-drop-report
Registry Maintenance Notifications
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sattler-epp-registry-maintenance/
Unhandled Namespaces
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gould-casanova-regext-unhandled-namespaces
Change Poll
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-regext-change-poll
RDAP Search
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fregly-regext-rdap-search-regex/
Data Set File Format
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-dataset/
Launch Phase Policy
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-launch-policy/
Login Security
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-login-security/
Antoin and Jim
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
