From: regext <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 6:15 PM To: Roger D Carney <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Hello Roger! From: iesg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roger D Carney Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 10:42 AM To: The IESG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) [snip] ** Section 6.1. This section needs a normative reference to W3C Schema as the format of the blob between the BEGIN and END tags. [RDC] I have not seen this in any EPP RFC, what reference is needed? [Roman] I can’t explain why EPP didn’t make a normative reference to cite XML Schema. I would recommend adding: Thompson, H., Beech, D., Maloney, M., and N. Mendelsohn, "XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition", W3C Recommendation REC-xmlschema-1-20041028, October 2004, <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/>. [SAH] The core EPP RFCs *DO* cite the W3C XML Schema Recommendations as normative references. Here’s what’s in RFC 5730: [W3C.REC-xmlschema-1-20041028] Maloney, M., Thompson, H., Mendelsohn, N., and D. Beech, "XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-xmlschema-1-20041028, October 2004, <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028>. [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028] Malhotra, A. and P. Biron, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-xmlschema-2-20041028, October 2004, <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028>. Scott
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
