Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS and COMMENT items. Two editorial matters that seem to have come up in the edits. ** To address the discuss point "Section 6.1. This section needs a normative reference to W3C Schema as the format of the blob between the BEGIN and END tags.", [W3C.REC-xmlschema-1-20041028] was added as a reference (thank you!) but not cited in the text. Please cite that reference in Section 6.1 (or earlier) ** Per IDnits: "== Missing Reference: 'RFC5646' is mentioned on line 449, but not defined" _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
