On Fri, Nov 1, 2019, at 15:40, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:
> > - did you look at other extensions existing?
> > I know at least about one having namespace 
> > http://www.verisign-grs.com/epp/suggestion-1.1
> > (I do not know the status of it as it has been removed from latest Verisign 
> > SDK,
> > but it existed).
> > There may be others.
> 
> Hmm, good point - i didn't check, didn't remember - and, indeed,
> there's one registered at ..., here's the direct link to the spec:
> https://www.verisign.com/assets/epp-sdk/EPP-Suggestion-Mapping.pdf?inc=www.verisigninc.com
> 
> It does indeed serve a very similar purpose, has more options, but is
> also more complex. I guess i will have to talk to Scott to understand
> why it was removed from the SDK..

+1
 
> > - please stick to RFC2606 when choosing names for examples (ie: do not use 
> > the TLD .tld)
> 
> I wanted to do that, but RFC2606 sadly provides only a very limited
> choice. I wanted to include something else besides subdomains, that's

You can use the .example TLD
So just s/\.tld/.example/g and everything is fine. But clearly bike shedding at 
this point.

Will try to read the draft more deeply later for substantive feedback, if any.

-- 
  Patrick Mevzek
  [email protected]

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to