Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-login-security-07: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-login-security/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Perhaps some simple questions (apologies if I'm missing something obvious): since there is no registry of custom events, how do developers of independent implementations know which custom events they should be aiming to support? And how do they understand the semantics associated with custom events beyond what the event names can convey? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- = Section 5 = "One schema is presented here that is the EPP Login Security Extension schema." This phrasing seems a little odd (is there more than one schema?). I would suggest "The EPP Login Security Extension schema is presented here." _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
