Hi, Gustavo, and thanks for addressing my comments. On just one point:
> — Section 10 — > What is the reason for allowing other encodings than UTF-8? Would it > not be best to say “MUST use UTF-8”, rather than making it > SHOULD/RECOMMENDED? > > Section 10 is modeled after section 5 of RFC 5730 that > draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping > uses extensively. The recommendation is to not make > draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping > more restrictive than EPP or not cause incompatibilities with existing > implementations by keeping > the language as is. OK, I'm going to go ahead and send this out for last call, but I'm also going to ask the I18N Directorate to have a closer look at this and see what they think. I do think it's time we make it clear that we are deprecating the use of encodings other than UTF-8 to represent Unicode in our protocols. 5370 is well over 10 years old now, and I don't really buy that we have to remain aligned with it today. Barry _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
