Hello, On Mon, May 4, 2020, at 08:04, Roger D Carney wrote: > Good Morning, > > Thanks for your review and comments Patrick. > > For the questions you brought up:
If possible, please also see the points I raised earlier in: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/d79sscIkCy0RR1yv-VZb3d2_D48/ > DDOS/SRS down - This draft is not intended to support emergency > notifications. Ok but then the draft says: <maint:reason> MUST be present and contains the reason behind the maintenance; values SHOULD either be 'planned' or 'emergency'. emergency is listed as a value... > <maint:description> - Draft will be updated to match text to schema. > Simply, we limited size to restrict someone from writing a book, is > there an alternative size people would suggest? I see no reason to limit it at the protocol level. And even if you do limit it, I do not think that "MUST NOT exceed 1024 bit." is the adequate description for a string of characters. -- Patrick Mevzek [email protected] _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
