> -----Original Message----- > From: regext <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Barry Leiba > Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 1:37 PM > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> > Cc: Gould, James <[email protected]>; [email protected]; The IESG > <[email protected]>; Gustavo Lozano <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf- > regext-data-escrow-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > I'm afraid I have to agree with Gustavo that the terms used here need to > match what's used in the domain this is written for. It's often the case that > things mean different things in different domains, and sometimes those > domains are similar enough that we wish it weren't the case. When it is, > that's sad... but. > > Unless someone in the working group wants to tell us that Gustavo is wrong > and we should go with what Rob suggests, I think the discussion has been > had. I *would* like to hear some input from the working group on this, > though, before we make any final decisions.
A description of the terms tied to their use in the document really should be sufficient. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
