+1 --
JG [cid:[email protected]] James Gould Fellow Engineer [email protected]<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/[email protected]> 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/> From: Roger Carney <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 2:42 PM To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: James Gould <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Gustavo Lozano <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) +1 Scott. ________________________________ From: regext <[email protected]> on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 12:53 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Gould, James <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Notice: This email is from an external sender. > -----Original Message----- > From: regext <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Barry Leiba > Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 1:37 PM > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> > Cc: Gould, James <[email protected]>; [email protected]; The IESG > <[email protected]>; Gustavo Lozano <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf- > regext-data-escrow-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > I'm afraid I have to agree with Gustavo that the terms used here need to > match what's used in the domain this is written for. It's often the case that > things mean different things in different domains, and sometimes those > domains are similar enough that we wish it weren't the case. When it is, > that's sad... but. > > Unless someone in the working group wants to tell us that Gustavo is wrong > and we should go with what Rob suggests, I think the discussion has been > had. I *would* like to hear some input from the working group on this, > though, before we make any final decisions. A description of the terms tied to their use in the document really should be sufficient. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1EvBdAuTh6SeIjTasIIGXwv8kKVDSLyt0_qT29j2WvMNxj8lBobpFge1St5yqvN7Zv_RuzvkCiMIx_mZ1oXG70mBsIjbmmoOjLKs3M57KzrpZ_eBlOUeJZKquyJMt25qLWjFVQcPO20KJto1AN7TJPB7joJYGqbM8-pBlMtJLwnn25SHl9dvOBxTt6mwrm-HXoCTrfieu6S2bBDzQMxGPkDtdUJLOhydh3qyKa32gyxWrKIfgX7SxOzE_Y8RwyMrYfqUm61iYqKZie2L3NjRoEg/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext>
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
