> On 24 Nov 2020, at 01:26, Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020, at 18:12, Taras Heichenko wrote:
>>> This is completely orthogonal to anything related to email addresses.
>>> Long gone are the days when only an email sent was enough to trigger a
>>> transfer,
>>> and for good reasons.
>>
>> I said nothing about only an email address but complete contact
>> information. Most
>> of our registrars were checking an entire Contact object to identify
>> the user requesting
>> a transfer to avoid court.
>
> I fail to see how this authenticates anything
> (and to be able to do this any registrar needs to be allowed to do
> contact:info
> on any contact, with a transfer in the future or not, which is surely a
> privacy
> problem at least, or the data must be public in whois/RDAP which is another
> privacy
> issue also, besides the fact that in this case anyone can just impersonate
> anyone
> else by reading the output in this model), but in all cases this is completely
> irrelevant to the discussion in this thread so no real point discussing one
> specific
> registry policy around transfers, yes they are many out there, none to my
> knowledge
> relying only on email value being known/available to reply.
Two notes:
- the authinfo field in a Contact object allows opening personal data to only
one registrar
- it is not registry policy, it is the registrar's agreement
>
> If registrars want to compare contact data before even staging a transfer
> request,
> and can per registry procedures/policies in which they operate,
> then there is no problem regarding EAI: if the customer gives an
> "internationalized" email
> to the registrar, and the registrar does not handle it, the problem will not
> be solved
> by anything done at the EPP level, so is completely out of scope here.
> The registrar will have to fix its systems first, and we are back to Mr.
> Levine point.
> Which is fine if registries want to do that, understanding that in that case
> some
> registrars may decide not to sell their TLDs, which can be fine or not, but a
> problem
> for the registry to decide and for which this protocol called EPP can not do
> anything.
I just wanted to say that if a registrar cannot handle the internationalised
email of new
customer it will lose new customers and this situation force it to fix its EPP.
>
> --
> Patrick Mevzek
> [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
--
Taras Heichenko
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
